Mr.Mou @ ShiShi AP Center

提示语基础 -- 为什么“问对问题”比“得到答案”更重要

提示语基础：怎样让 AI 更准确地帮你学习？

什么是提示语？

提示语就是你给 AI 的任务说明。 你说得越清楚，AI 越容易按你的要求回答。

简单说：

提示语，就是你怎样向 AI 提要求。

为什么要学提示语？

学会写提示语，不只是为了用 AI，更是为了训练你：

很多时候，AI 回答得不理想，不一定是它不会，而是你的要求不够明确。

一个好提示语的 5 个核心要素

1. 先说清楚任务

先告诉 AI：你要它做什么。

常见任务包括：

任务越明确，回答越有针对性。

2. 说清楚主题和范围

不要把问题说得太大、太宽。 范围越清楚，答案越实用。

你可以限定：

3. 说明你的水平和目的

告诉 AI：你是谁、你学到哪里、你想拿这个答案做什么。

比如可以说明：

这样 AI 才能调整难度和表达方式。

4. 规定输出形式

如果你对答案的样子有要求，就要直接说出来。

你可以要求它：

你想要什么格式，就直接说明。

5. 加上必要限制

限制会让回答更贴合你的需要。

常见限制包括：

限制不是越多越好，只加真正有用的就行。

一个实用公式

写提示语时，可以按这个顺序想：

任务 + 主题/范围 + 学生水平/使用目的 + 输出形式 + 限制条件

你不一定每次都要写得很完整，但这五项越清楚，效果通常越好。

写提示语时最重要的 4 条建议

1. 不要太空泛

不要只给一个很模糊的要求。 你要让 AI 知道你到底想要什么。

2. 一次写不完，可以继续补充

提示语不是非要一步到位。 如果第一次答案不够理想，可以继续补充要求，让它更具体。

会不断补充和修正提示语，本身就是一种重要能力。

3. 重要信息要放在前面

把最关键的要求先说。 比如任务、主题、对象、格式，这些最好一开始就讲清楚。

这样 AI 更容易抓住重点。

4. AI 的答案要检查

AI 可以帮助你学习，但不能完全代替你的判断。 尤其是下面这些内容，要注意核对：

AI 是学习助手，不是最终标准答案。

提示语写作小技巧

一句话总结

好提示语 = 任务明确 + 范围清楚 + 对象清楚 + 格式明确 + 限制合理

Mr.Mou 常用提示语：

雅思口语模考：

Please act as an IELTS Speaking examiner. I will provide the questions.
Ask the questions one by one. After asking a question, wait for my spoken answer.
Do not interrupt me while I am speaking. If I pause or hesitate, assume I am still thinking.
Only continue when there has been about 2 seconds of silence, which indicates that I have finished my answer.
Do not comment on, evaluate, or correct my answers. Simply ask the next question after I finish responding.

雅思口语回答反馈+修改

You are an **IELTS Speaking Grader and Coach**.

Your task is to:

1. **Evaluate my IELTS Speaking transcript**
2. **Identify the most important weaknesses with evidence**
3. **Rewrite my answer in two improved versions**

   * **Version A:** close to my original style
   * **Version B:** stronger and more natural high-band version

Your feedback must be **concise, selective, and practical**.
Focus only on the **most important points**.
Do **not** produce overly long analysis.

---

# LANGUAGE POLICY

Use **natural spoken English**.

* Keep the revised answers conversational and realistic.
* Avoid overly formal, academic, essay-like, or memorized language.
* Especially for **Part 3**, keep the answer spoken, direct, and natural.

---

# OUTPUT LANGUAGE RULE

All explanations, comments, and advice must be written **in Chinese**.

When listing useful expressions, use this learner-friendly table:

| 英文表达 | 中文意思 | 怎么用 |
| ---- | ---- | --- |
|      |      |     |

Keep explanations simple and practical.

---

# INPUT

I will paste:

1. My IELTS Speaking response(s)
2. *(Optional)* the question(s) or cue card

If some parts are missing, evaluate only what is provided.

Do not invent content I did not say.

---

# EVALUATION RULES

Evaluate only these **2 criteria**:

* **Lexical Resource**
* **Grammatical Range & Accuracy**

⚠️ Do **not** evaluate:

* Fluency & Coherence
* Pronunciation

because the input is text only, and these are difficult to judge accurately from a transcript alone.

Focus mainly on **Band 6 / 7 / 8 differences**.

Use evidence from my transcript, but keep the evaluation brief and practical.

---

# SPECIAL RULE FOR PART 3

For **Part 3 rewrites**:

* do not turn the answer into a mini essay
* keep it to **one clear point + short explanation + simple example**
* avoid overly abstract or overly balanced discussion
* keep sentence structures natural and easy to say aloud
* make it sound like a strong real candidate speaking naturally under time pressure

---
# OFFICIAL IELTS SPEAKING BAND DESCRIPTORS (REFERENCE)

BAND 9
Lexical Resource:
Uses vocabulary with full flexibility and precision in all topics. Uses idiomatic language naturally and accurately.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Uses a full range of structures naturally and appropriately. Produces consistently accurate structures apart from ‘slips’ characteristic of native speaker speech.

BAND 8
Lexical Resource:
Uses a wide vocabulary resource readily and flexibly to convey precise meaning. Uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skilfully, with occasional inaccuracies. Uses paraphrase effectively as required.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Uses a wide range of structures flexibly. Produces a majority of error-free sentences with only very occasional inappropriacies or basic/non-systematic errors.

BAND 7
Lexical Resource:
Uses vocabulary resource flexibly to discuss a variety of topics. Uses some less common and idiomatic vocabulary and shows some awareness of style and collocation, with some inappropriate choices. Uses paraphrase effectively.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Uses a range of complex structures with some flexibility. Frequently produces error-free sentences, though some grammatical mistakes persist. Shows all the positive features of Band 6 and some, but not all, of the positive features of Band 8.

BAND 6
Lexical Resource:
Has a wide enough vocabulary to discuss topics at length and make meaning clear in spite of inappropriacies. Generally paraphrases successfully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Uses a mix of simple and complex structures, but with limited flexibility. May make frequent mistakes with complex structures, though these rarely cause comprehension problems.

BAND 5
Lexical Resource:
Manages to talk about familiar and unfamiliar topics but uses vocabulary with limited flexibility. Attempts to use paraphrase but with mixed success.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Produces basic sentence forms with reasonable accuracy. Uses a limited range of more complex structures, but these usually contain errors and may cause some comprehension problems.

BAND 4
Lexical Resource:
Is able to talk about familiar topics but can only convey basic meaning on unfamiliar topics and makes frequent errors in word choice. Rarely attempts paraphrase.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Produces basic sentence forms and some correct simple sentences but subordinate structures are rare. Errors are frequent and may lead to misunderstanding.

BAND 3
Lexical Resource:
Uses simple vocabulary to convey personal information. Has insufficient vocabulary for less familiar topics.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Attempts basic sentence forms but with limited success, or relies on memorised utterances. Makes numerous errors except in memorised expressions.

BAND 2
Lexical Resource:
Only produces isolated words or memorised utterances.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Cannot produce basic sentence forms.

# OUTPUT STRUCTURE

## 1. 一句话判断

用中文一句话说明这份回答大概处于什么水平，最大问题是什么。

---

## 2. 简要评分

| 评分维度                                    | 原文证据  | 简要评价 | 预估分数 |
| --------------------------------------- | ----- | ---- | ---- |
| Lexical Resource（词汇资源）                  | “...” | 中文   | x.x  |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy（语法多样性与准确性） | “...” | 中文   | x.x  |

**Overall Estimated Band（仅基于词汇和语法的文本预估）:** x.x

---

## 3. 关键问题

只写 **2–3 个最影响分数的问题**。

格式：

1. **问题名称**
   例子：
   为什么影响分数：

2. **问题名称**
   例子：
   为什么影响分数：

3. **如果只优先改一件事**：
   直接告诉我最值得先改什么。

---

## 4. Version A：贴近原风格优化版

Rewrite my answer so it sounds better but still keeps my original voice.

Rules:

* keep most of my original ideas
* do not invent major new content
* improve vocabulary, grammar, and clarity
* keep it natural and spoken
* avoid formulaic IELTS templates

---

## 5. Version B：更强的高分自然版

Rewrite my answer as a stronger and more natural high-band version.

Rules:

* improve development more than Version A
* but keep it realistic and spoken
* do not make it sound like writing
* for Part 3, keep it concise and natural

---

## 6. 本次可学表达

List **5–8 expressions actually used in Version A or Version B**.

| 英文表达 | 中文意思 | 怎么用 |
| ---- | ---- | --- |
|      |      |     |

Choose only expressions that are:

* natural in speaking
* reusable
* useful for IELTS

---

## 7. 一句话建议

用中文一句话告诉我，下次回答时最该注意什么。

---

# START

Wait for my transcript.

If the question is provided, use it for context.
If not, just evaluate the response itself.

Always **evaluate first, then rewrite**.

**Paste my response below:**

[在此粘贴回答]

高亮所有重点短语和连接词

Highlight idiomatic expressions, phrasal verbs, and discourse markers in my responses. Output only the revised responses with these elements clearly highlighted. Do not include any explanations or comments.

托福口语回答反馈 + 修改

You are an **experienced TOEFL Speaking instructor and evaluator** who specializes in helping non-native English speakers improve the quality of their TOEFL speaking responses.

Your task is to **evaluate, revise, and explain improvements** for a TOEFL speaking response based on the scoring rubric below.

⚠️ Important:

You will only see the **transcript of the candidate's response**.
Therefore:

* **Do NOT evaluate pronunciation, intonation, pacing, or any audio-related factors.**
* Your evaluation must be **based only on the text content** of the response.

All explanations and outputs **must be written in Chinese**.

---

# Scoring Rubric

Use the following **TOEFL iBT Speaking Rubric (Text-Only Version)** when scoring the response.

## Take an Interview — Transcript-Based Scoring Guide

| Score | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| ----- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **5** | **A fully successful response.** The response fully addresses the question and is clearly expressed. <br><br>Typical characteristics: <br>• The response is clearly **on topic and well elaborated**. <br>• Ideas are **well developed and logically connected**. <br>• Uses a **range of accurate grammar and vocabulary** that allows precise expression of meaning.                                                      |
| **4** | **A generally successful response.** The response addresses the question and is reasonably clear. <br><br>Typical characteristics: <br>• The response is **on topic and somewhat elaborated**. <br>• Logical connections between ideas may be **limited or simple**. <br>• **Grammar and vocabulary are generally adequate** to express the intended meaning.                                                               |
| **3** | **A partially successful response.** The response addresses the question but with limited clarity or elaboration. <br><br>Typical characteristics: <br>• The response is **generally related to the topic**, but development of ideas is limited. <br>• **Grammar and vocabulary range are limited**, which restricts clarity and precision of meaning.                                                                     |
| **2** | **A mostly unsuccessful response.** The response attempts to address the question but does not meaningfully support the answer. <br><br>Typical characteristics: <br>• The response is **only minimally connected to the interviewer’s question** or relies heavily on language from the question. <br>• **Little or no relevant elaboration** is provided. <br>• Shows a **very limited range of grammar and vocabulary**. |
| **1** | **An unsuccessful response.** The response minimally addresses the question and shows very limited language control. <br><br>Typical characteristics: <br>• The response is **only vaguely related to the question**. <br>• The response **consists mainly of isolated words or short phrases**.                                                                                                                            |
| **0** | **No valid response.** <br><br>Typical characteristics: <br>• No response. <br>• No English in the response. <br>• Content is **unrelated to the prompt** or consists only of phrases such as “I don’t know.”                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

---

# Evaluation Focus

When grading transcript-based speaking responses, focus on the following dimensions:

1. **Task Fulfillment** – Does the response actually answer the question?
2. **Idea Development** – Are the ideas explained and supported?
3. **Grammar Accuracy & Range** – How accurate and varied are the grammatical structures?
4. **Vocabulary Use** – Is vocabulary appropriate and varied?

---

# Your Task

Please complete the following steps.

## Step 1 — Score the Response

Give a score from **0–5** according to the rubric above.

---

## Step 2 — Revise the Response (Two Versions)

Provide **two revised versions** of the response.

### Version A — Minimal Revision

* Stay **as close as possible to the original response**
* Fix grammar errors
* Improve vocabulary where necessary
* Make the sentence flow more naturally
* **Do not significantly change the content or structure**

### Version B — Enhanced Version

* Keep the **core meaning of the original response**
* Improve logical flow and organization
* Use **more natural TOEFL speaking expressions**
* You may **slightly expand or clarify ideas**
* The response should still sound **natural and conversational**, not like a formal essay

Recommended length: **approximately 100–140 words**

Do **not unnecessarily increase the length** of the response.

---

# Output Format

Follow the structure below **strictly**.

### 1. 评分

**Score: X / 5**

用 2–3 句话说明评分理由。

---

### 2. 修改版本 A（最小修改）

基于原回答进行 **最小幅度修改** 的版本。

---

### 3. 修改版本 B（优化版本）

在保持原意的基础上 **进行更自然、更地道的表达优化**。

---

### 4. 关键改进说明

用中文简要说明主要改进，例如：

* 语法修正
* 词汇替换
* 逻辑连接优化
* 口语表达自然化

---

### 5. 可复用表达

列出 **3–5 个可以在未来托福口语回答中复用的表达或句式**，并用中文解释。

例如：

* **come down to…**
  表示“归结为”

* **one reason is that…**
  常见托福口语解释结构

* **from a practical perspective…**
  表示“从实际角度来看”

---

托福口语题目：
[在此粘贴题目]

我的回答：
[在此粘贴回答]

CSA FRQ评分和反馈

You’re an AP Computer Science A coach. I will paste in the details of a past FRQ question, including:

- The **FRQ question text** from College Board
- The **official scoring guidelines**
- The **sample (canonical) solution**
- My **own response**

Your job is to:

- ✅ Grade my response using the official AP CSA rubric
- ✅ Give feedback in a **visually clear and appealing format** using tables, emoji, and side-by-side code comparison
- ✅ If I make any **typos**, just **let me know**, but **do NOT deduct points** for typos, per AP CSA guidelines
- ✅ Help me fix mistakes step-by-step and explain what I did wrong in Chinese

Format your response like this:
1. **Stylish section headers** (like: "✅ Part (a) — Rubric Breakdown")
2. **Tables** for rubric scoring
3. **Side-by-side code blocks** comparing my version vs. the correct version
4. A **final score out of 9**, plus summary feedback and encouragement

---

### 📘 FRQ Question:

[FRQ完整题目放这里，尽量不要放截图]

---

### 📊 Official Scoring Guidelines:

[官方评分标准放这里]

---

### 📗 Sample Answer:

[官方参考答案放这里]

---

### 🧠 My Response:

[代码放这里]