TPO68 Task1
Task1
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Allworkersshould be required to stop working and retire by age sixty-five?Use details and examples to explain your opinion.
| New Word | Pronunciation | Part of Speech | English Explanation | Chinese Explanation | Example Sentence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Require | ► | Verb | To need something for a particular purpose or to make something necessary. | 需要。 | "Most companies require their employees to have at least a bachelor's degree for job applications." |
| Retire | ► | Verb | To stop working, usually because of reaching a certain age or after a long period of employment. | 退休。 | "My dad plans to retire next year after working at the same company for over thirty years." |
| Statement | ► | Noun | Something that is said or written that expresses an opinion or provides information. | 声明。 | "The teacher asked us to write a statement about our views on school uniforms." |
class2026修改文稿点这里
George
In my opinion, I don't think all occurs workers should be restart required to stop working and retired retire by age 65. sixty-five. First, in at that age, many workers have a lot of experience, which means they form a mature main site, and this have developed valuable skills. This experience can help them to deal with a lot of handle complex situation situations and questions solve problems, and many firms companies need these abilities. Second, I think believe that nowadays many people maintain take care of their body will, health, which means their body they are comfortable for continue physically capable of continuing to work in their job.jobs.
Richard
I totally disagree with the statement that all the workers should require be required to stop working and return retire by age 65. Because I believe that the retirement age should be flexible, as it is differential can differ for men and women to work. To be specific, men's are more powerful and stressful to engage women. For example, men may have different physical demands in work and contribute to society. They are above age of 60 and around 65 and that's the time for them to retire. Women their jobs, but that doesn't mean they should retire earlier strictly at 65. On the other hand, women might have different career paths or responsibilities that could influence their retirement age. It's important to consider individual circumstances rather than men's because they are less powerful and so they should take set a rest earlier.fixed retirement age for everyone.
Kevin
In my opinion, I totally agree with the statement that all workers should be required to stop working and retired retire by age 65. And first I think First, when people at reach age 65, their work like they have usually worked for more than 30 or 40 years, so they get years. They have earned enough money and they work have worked very hard, so hard and they work for a long time. So it's it’s time for them to relax and second, when relax. Second, as people get older, their reflection is slower reflexes and their mind works slower. So mental processing can slow down. This means they can do a better job than the may not be able to perform as well as younger people, so workers. For these reasons, I think believe they should retire and stop working.
Wesley
From my perspective, I disagree with the statement that all workers should be required to stop working and retire by age 65. As some jobs really need lots Some jobs, like those in science, require a lot of time to be experienced experience. For example, scientists who work in fields like scientists, for example, some scientists work on biology or physics often need years of research to use their produce meaningful results. Sometimes, these results from the study to show their authority. However, those results may come out with can take over 10 years to develop, and by the time and they may achieve their findings, they might already add 65 years be past the age of 65. Therefore, I believe it's important for workers in these fields to continue working beyond that time. So I disagree with the statement.age.
Cicily
I agree that the image is also workers should stop working and it is very hard to see. My reason is that retire by age sixty-five. I think the work is can sometimes be full of our boring and stressful, which can make life and also it goes less enjoyable. When people retire, they have more time to make our life more complete. Today we can have the same to do relax and it do things they love. This can make our life more interesting and how more go fulfilling. Retiring at sixty-five allows people to make our life enjoy their energy and live a more satisfying and be overful for the energy to live.life.
Leon
I hope the belief believe that the workers should be required to stop working at and retire at the by age of 65 because sixty-five. I think that as we all know that the people get older, they may face more health issues, which can lead to problems at work. If older men workers continue working, it could create challenges for younger workers who spawn well easily should get a be broken and so that will cost a lot of potential problems and so this and the cost will be higher than are just the poor younger that so starting their careers. Therefore, I think they should stop to workit's better for everyone if workers retire at sixty-five.
Tina
I agree with the statement that all the workers should be required to stop working and retire at by age 85 because first it sixty-five. First, retiring can help them to be more healthy healthier because they work many workers have been working for many years a long time, and it is necessary for them can be tough on their health to stay up late every day day. If they retire, they will have more time to enjoy life and these were hard for take care of their health condition and if they retire they have much time till enjoying their time and second they also have health. Second, retirement allows them to relax because and spend time with their families or pursue hobbies they love. Overall, I believe that retiring at sixty-five can lead to a better quality of the three typeslife.
Zao
From my perspectives, perspective, I think all works workers should a lot be required to stop working and retire by age 65. I have two reasons for this. Firstly, if the people over 65 and they retire, they stop to work. They will may increase their children's stress because they require their children to give no might need financial support from them. Secondly, I believe 65 is still a young age. Many people at that age can handle various jobs and earn money to stop support their life. Secondly, I think 65 still are very young age. families. They can handle many jobs and they can make money also contribute positively to stop their family. And also, they can bring the benefit for the societies. So all in all, society. So, overall, I think they should still work.
Steven
I think all workers should be required to stop working and retired retire by age 65 because when people are 65 it's old because, at that age, they have worked long enough and it's time for them deserve to enjoy their own life. In another part, lives. Additionally, if older workers retire, it opens up more job opportunities for younger people. This way, younger workers can step in and bring fresh ideas and energy to the shoot stopped working and let more young people to work to provide young people more opportunity to replace this old people's place so that they can work more efficiency.workforce.
Joyce
I tell you a good way believe that requiring all workers to stop working and retire by age 65 because it's good sixty-five can be beneficial for both the company and the worker. employees. For instance, actually example, after the age of sixty-five, many people may experience health issues or a person after 65 always have get some sick or don't have so much energy so maybe they can't do finish decrease in energy, which could affect their ability to work effectively and efficiently. So actually it's not good effectively. This can impact the company's productivity. Therefore, it might be better for the development of the company and company better companies to hire some youngyounger workers who can bring fresh ideas and energy to the workplace.
Michael
I agree with these statements the statement that all workers should be required to stop working and they retire by age sixty-five. I think this is important for a couple of reasons. First, workers who are too really into supporting my opinions. First is if the workers age are ready above the 65s age, they over sixty-five may not have less as much energy to work. If perform their jobs effectively. When older workers are in the company is also higher than workforce, it will be less efficient and can lead to decreased efficiency for the second point is company. Second, there are a lot of young many younger people who can do the work more efficient efficiently than the old older workers. So if the By allowing workers age above the 65s they can stop working and provide a status over sixty-five to retire, we create opportunities for the young younger workers to work.step in and contribute to the workforce.
Alice
In my opinion, I agree that our workers should be required to stop working and retire by age 65, because they are too old to work and it's really not good for their physical health. 65. This is because, at that age, many individuals may face health challenges that make working difficult. For example, they sit for a often spend long time hours sitting and look staring at the screen for a long time. It's bad for screens, which can lead to eye strain and other health issues. Additionally, as people get older, they might experience memory lapses, which could affect their eyes. They are job performance. Therefore, allowing them to retire at 65 could help them maintain their health and they are old men, so it will hurt to them. And also, they maybe will forget something. So it's better to let them retire.well-being.
Selina
Well, for me, I agree with this statement. For The reason that I think the this is that workers who are already 65 years old often have less energy to then continue to do work. And they working. They may feel very tired and they can't complete the work very efficient. So tired, which can affect their efficiency. I think believe they should have more relaxed time to let relax so their body bodies and brain feel relaxed and minds can recover. Additionally, at that age, they shouldn't do the high level might not be able to handle high-stress jobs or the tired working. physically demanding work. That's my opinion about this.on this matter.
Eric
I agree with that all workers should be required to stop working and retired retire by age 65. The first One reason is that this will policy could save the companies money because the technology is always developing. So if they If companies want to sue that use new technology, the company needs to train the workers. So if there are too many people in the companies, they need to pay a lot of money. And the second train their workers, and having too many employees can increase costs. Another reason is that if as people become more and more old, the get older, their efficiency will be decreasing because if people become old, there are tends to decrease. Older workers may not have enough energy to push them to work.keep up with the demands of their jobs.
Andy
I agree with the idea that all workers should be required to stop working and retire by the age 165. The first of sixty-five. One reason is that when as people become older and get older, their mental and physical health and their body health is not may decline, making it harder for them to perform the same jobs as good as a young. Which younger workers. This means that they may need to pay exert more strength and effort to complete the same job. It is not suitable for these older people to work in the same job. And the second tasks. Another reason is that when older workers might not be as efficient as they are older, they are working efficiently once were, which could lead to decrease. Which means that lower productivity in the company will not accept that they are such lower effort.workplace. Companies may struggle with maintaining their performance if older employees cannot work as effectively.”
Joe
I totally agree with that all the workers should be required to stop working and retire by age 65 because when 65. At that age, many people's physical abilities decrease significantly. Although they are at age 65 they are physical ability are decreased a lot although they have many benefits to have them like they may have a lot of experience of working but experience, it is difficult can be challenging for them to save them adapt to new demands from companies. I think it's important for other companies benefitsworkers to enjoy their retirement while they are still healthy enough to do so.
Karl
I think that when people reach the age of 65, they need to should retire to stop working. The first from their jobs. One reason for this is that they have already put enough efforts on in a lot of effort during their jobs. working years. For example, factory workers often spend long hours creating products, and at some point, they deserve a worker in a factory spends much more time break. Another reason is that retirement gives them the opportunity to create goods. So they need to have time. Second is they have time that pursue their passions and interests. For instance, they can spend what they want to do. For example, they can go travel to places they have never reached. And so that they they’ve always wanted to visit, which allows them to gain new experiences and enjoy life in a different way. Overall, retiring at 65 can reach their life experience in the rest of his lead to a more fulfilling life.
Carol
I totally agree with that. The that workers should be required to stop work working and retire by age 65. The first One reason is that I think many workers spend their whole lives working, which can be exhausting. At this stage in their lives, they are always working almost life. So they are very tired in these years. So in this year they really need to enjoy themselves and maybe do something that focus on their hobbies to relax. If they are hobbies and just make continue to work too hard, it can affect their health. Additionally, their efficiency at work tends to decrease as they age. So, in conclusion, I believe it's important for them relax. And this year is very... for them, if they have a higher tired work, they will make them unhealthy. And the efficiency also will already decrease at this time. And so, all in all, I think they need to have a chance to relax as they are.and enjoy their retirement.
Meredith
I agree with the that all workers should be required to stop working and retired retire by age 65. sixty-five. The reason for this is that is because when as people are getting get older, as they are working their ability to work and also the healthy will have a problem or will decrease. their health can decline. For the older people, individuals, it is hard for them can be challenging to adapt the to new knowledge on the and skills required at work. Also They might not perform their tasks as efficiently, and their health issues can increase. Moreover, they will finish may experience a lot of pressure from their work well, low efficiency and also the health in getting worse too. They can take too many pressure on their work.jobs.
Jason
I agree with this following the statement that the workers should be required to stop working and retire by age 65. The first One reason is that if all of the workers are workers, being people, so they should have a need rest and take breaks. So, required Requiring them to stop working retire at age of 65 can help keep them health. And the second is that healthy. Additionally, if they older workers continue to work too hard with them, the business will become larger. So it's not have the hard, it can limit opportunities for younger workers. So, having a retirement age of 65 can benefit for the young men. So they can stop working at age 65.everyone.
Raymond
I don't think this that there should be the a requirement that they must for everyone to stop working at age 65. This is because I think in Many families depend on the income of older workers. For some families, for people over 65, they might be the age 65, there are only source of income of for their families. They must need to work to support their children or other family members. Even in families that are financially stable, some older individuals may want to continue working for their children, their other families, and in some other families, maybe they are not shorting money, but they won't work for a play.personal fulfillment or enjoyment.
Lauren
I agree with the statement that all workers should be required to stop working and retire by age 16. sixty-five. Firstly, because a person's body conditions will decrease after 16. So, health can decline as they should spend more get older, so it's important for them to have time to take care their health well. of themselves. For example, my father, before the 16 years ago, he father was very strong and he never felt tired. But now, tired before he turned sixty-five, but now he often felt feels tired. Secondly, I think it also can... believe that people should enjoy their lives after 16.they retire. They deserve time to relax and pursue their interests without the stress of work.
Tom
I firmly agree with this the statement that all workers should be required to stop workers at an entire working and retire by age 65. Firstly, people over 65 For some reason, firstly, if the people have more than 65 ages, they will have may face more risks That because their physical bodies cannot afford this huge work load that may cause some might not handle a heavy workload, which could lead to dangerous accidents And second, young people accidents. Secondly, if older workers retire, it would have create more choice job opportunities for younger people. This could lead to greater efficiency in companies, as younger workers often bring fresh ideas and more jobs That it motivation. Overall, requiring retirement at 65 could promote the companies that more efficiency work benefit both individuals and more ideas make these companies better and more and more promotion and motivations So this might be...businesses.
Mike
From my perspective, I strongly disagree with the idea that people should be required to stop working and retire at the age of 65. The One reason is that if people retire at work very too late, they may not work as careful carefully as before, before because people will hate the work they could become frustrated with their jobs and withdraw from some high-intense works. avoid more demanding tasks. For example, my grandfather used had to work longer than he wanted due to certain circumstances. Eventually, he decided to leave his previous job and took on more relaxed positions. This shows that not everyone fits into the same retirement mold, and people should have the freedom to choose when to retire very late because of some specific situations. He will withdraw from his previous work and do some very leisure jobs to...based on their own situations.
Isaiah
I agree with the following statements statement that all of the workers should be required to stop working and retired retire by age 65. I have two riddance, first reasons for this. First of all, because they have worked decades of years. So for many decades, and after retiring, they can spend quality time with their families or they can travel all around the world. Secondly, it is safe safer for them to retire before 65 because when because, as they get old, older, their body is bodies are not good as them before.strong as they used to be.
Mason
I totally agree with the statement that all workers should be required to stop working and retire by age 65. The One reason is the that people about 65, they around 65 often have lower work is very low efficiency. They can do much work as young people. efficiency compared to younger workers. For example, my father, he's not really good at computer father struggles with using computers, and as the development of society, society develops, he don't know a lot of doesn't keep up with new knowledge. So Therefore, I believe he should retire. And also, Additionally, older workers should make space for younger people who can bring fresh ideas and skills to the old people should give the place to young people.workplace.
Claire
For this statement statement, I will visit, explain that I think workers should be required to stop working and to retire by age 65. I have a couple of reasons to explain it. And first reason is, for this. First, I think it's good believe it is beneficial for their house, because health, as 65 is quite an old age. If they have the 655 age. It's a very old age for them. So, expect if they do this work very been working hard and get under a lot of pressure, you will get lots of physical health, it can take a bath for toll on their physical health. And second, as Second, it is the inconvenience can be inconvenient for others, because in this younger workers. In many workplaces, there are a lot of younger employees, and if older workers continue to work, there are lots of young workers, so may be communication barriers since they might not understand each other well. Therefore, if they communicate, they don't know what they are talking about. So if they stop working, they will just come in and say,older workers retire, it could create a better work environment for everyone.